Funding the Bailouts by Printing Money and Issuing Debt
Ever wonder how the Government is able to fund all the bailout and rescue efforts, including President Obama's proposed $800 billion stimulus package? Especially given the fact that the US is the biggest debtor nation with over 10 trillion dollars in national debt! The answer is simple, we just print more money or sell more treasuries.
Because of the US’ safe haven status and the dollar's global benchmark status (since the gold standard was abolished), the world keeps on investing in America and thereby buying more dollars. A recent NY times article delved into this issue and it was eye opening to see the magnitude of the US money supply growth and the potential consequences to the nation in the years ahead.
The Federal Reserve, who oversees the nations money supply has the authority to print dollars at will. Since August 2008, the Federal Reserve has expanded its balance sheet from about $900 billion to more than $2.2 trillion, creating $1.3 trillion that did not exist to replace some of the billions wiped out in the financial crisis. In the case of the Treasury, the money comes from the same wellspring that has been financing American debt for decades: Investors in the United States and around the world — not least, the central banks of China, Japan and Saudi Arabia, which have parked most of their national savings in the safety of American government bonds. The value of outstanding American Treasury bills now reaches $10.6 trillion, a number sure to increase as dollars are spent under Obama’s economic rescue plan, saving auto jobs and preventing the collapse of government-backed mortgage giants.
Is there an end to sight and what are the long term consequences?
As the financial crisis deepens, the government’s only option seems to be to spend our way out of the current mess in an attempt to boost consumer demand and sustain business investment to create jobs. The mantra seems to be “Print money today, fret about the consequences tomorrow. Otherwise, invite a loss of jobs and business failures that could cripple the nation for years”. The incoming Obama administration already announced a massive stimulus package, so it is unlikely in the next few years that government spending (and hence printing more money/selling more treasuries) will stop.
But what it foreign investors start doubting the American wherewithal to pay back such an extraordinary sum, prompting them to stop — or at least slow — their deposits of savings into the United States? That could send the dollar plummeting, making imported goods more expensive for American consumers and businesses. It would force the Treasury to pay higher returns to find takers for its debt, increasing interest rates for home- and auto-buyers, for businesses and credit-card holders. It could potentially send the American economy into a depression for years to come.
Some argue that the moment for sobriety is long overdue, and postponing it further only increases the ultimate costs. “Our government doesn’t have enough spare cash to bail out a lemonade stand,” declared Peter Schiff president of Euro Pacific Capital. “Our standard of living must decline to reflect years of reckless consumption and the disintegration of our industrial base. Only by swallowing this tough medicine now will our sick economy ever recover.”
In Conclusion:
Long term though the consequences are more grave as discussed above. Eventually the American and global economy will recover and all the old issues like high oil, inflation and investing bubbles will return. However, I do think the US dollar will be pummelled due to the massive amount of national debt. As a nation, America will be much poorer and foreign investing will become a must for all of us. Future administrations will have to focus on cutting government spending to reign in the deficit, which could cause massive job losses in the public sector. Also one thing this crisis will have shown is that the US financial system is as brittle as anywhere else in the world and foreign governments and investors will be less likely to invest or support US debt as they have been in the past. America will always be the land of the free, but it may no longer be the land of the rich.
What do you think? Will America emerge stronger and wealthier in the long term, or is the nation in for a long term decline?
Picture : Darren Hester
Liked what you read? Then consider subscribing (free) to get the latest articles delivered directly via RSS or Email

January 14, 2009 11:28 AM
Andy,
The problem is that other countries like China, or the arab nations do not have anywhere else to put their foreign currency reserves but in US gvt debt.
Most foreign central banks alos hold the majority of their currency reserves in US dollars. they won't keep them in chinese yuans or japanese yen.
In addition to that, if the Chinese and arab nations stop buying US debt, then they will have smaller revenues which will increase their unemployment and thus increase social unrest there.
It is in the best situation for the world economy that the US economy doesn't fall further.
I also doubt that the money that the FED gave to the banks increased money supply that much and will cause hyperinflation, since banks are mostly hoarding cash, and the money velocity seems to be decreasing. (deleveraging anyone).
Without any real demand for goods and services we won't have any inflation, but we will have deflation, even if the FED gave everyone more money.
January 14, 2009 1:16 PM
I don't think we're in for a decline in an absolute sense, but this debt will weigh on our growth for generations to come. We will almost certainly go into relative decline and be surpassed as the world's largest economy at some point in the next 50 years. Overall, I think living standards will continue to rise over the long-term, albeit much slower than before. And I think I'm being pretty optimistic in saying that.
January 14, 2009 7:35 PM
Good call on Citigroup. Here is a light hearted take on Citi's too big to fail model:
http://www.talkstocktrading.com/is-citigroup-a-tommy-big-business-and-the-martin-lawrence-connection/
January 25, 2009 5:47 PM
Interesting to see that Anna Schwartz is in favour of printing money. She co-authored some of Milton Friedman's most important works. And she and Friedman were very much AGAINST sudden money supply increases. They advocated a small annual increase of 2% or so. If she of all people now advocates printing significant amounts of money, this bolsters the case for money printing.
As to whether this money printing means hyperinflation in a few years, it all depends on whether central banks and governments can claw back the money or clamp down in other ways, and at the right moment. Or in the words of a former Fed chairman William McChesney Martin, the job of a central bank is to "withdraw the punch-bowl just as the party gets started".
February 28, 2009 5:22 AM
The problem is borrowing interest-bearing debt notes from a private banking system. End the FED or put it under Treasury and use the FED's zero interest borrowing power to put credit into the system instead of debt--money that can go directly toward goods and services and not to servicing "interest" for private bankers and investors.
April 2, 2009 10:27 PM
We can't print money but the government can. Let's hold the government to the same standards as the citizens of this country. Printing money is NOT the only way to solve our economic problems. There are several other ways that all add up to cutting taxes on free enterprise which got us to be a world leader...The talk group at Target
June 20, 2009 1:24 AM
The dilemma is the domestic's work costs are still based on the standards only made achievable by monopoly power.
However does anybody sincerely consider this car bailout is regarding liquidity?