Following my recently updated article on new 401K and IRA limits, I thought I would look at some of the changes being made around traditional and Roth IRA’s in the year ahead, including contribution and recently introduced opportunities to convert between traditional and IRA accounts irrespective of income. Roth IRA’s generally differ from traditional IRA’s in that contributions are made after tax, but this is offset by having to pay no taxes when the funds are withdrawn at retirement.
Opening and contributing to a Roth IRA is currently restricted to those with an adjusted income limit (AGI) of $120,000 (individuals) and $176,000 (couples). The maximum annual contribution to Roth IRA’s is generally $5,000 for savers under the age of 50 and $6,000 for savers over 50. The table below provides a summary of Roth IRA contribution/AGI limits from the IRS (click graphic to expand):
When Can You Make Contributions? You can make contributions to a Roth IRA for a year at any time during the year or by the due date of your return for that year (not including extensions). You can make contributions for by the due date (not including extensions) for filing your tax return. This means that most people can make contributions for by April 15. For example, you can start or make 2009 Roth IRA contributions until in April 15th 2010.
New Rules for 2010 Roth IRA Conversions
You can also convert from a traditional to Roth IRA, but the rules were quite restrictive. Only taxpayers with Modified Adjusted Gross Incomes (MAGI) of less than $100,000 in the year of conversion and not married filing separately may convert from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. However new tax laws in 2010 are changing the conversion limit, meaning that people who have or are interested in investing for retirement via IRA’s need to look at which vehicle and contribution method (post or pre tax) is best for their situation.
Next year, all taxpayers – even those making more than $100,000 a year in adjusted income – will be allowed to convert to Roth IRA accounts from traditional IRAs. That means that more than 15 million Americans, can consider whether they want to make tax-deductible contributions if they have a traditional IRA or pay the taxes up front and have tax- free withdrawals during retirement with a Roth IRA. Which is better depends on future tax rates and how much the conversion will cost. It may not make sense to pay taxes today at a higher rate because many investors will be in a lower tax bracket during retirement, according to Tom Orecchio in a recent Bloomberg interview of various tax and financial planners, a fee- only adviser at Modera Wealth Management. “From a tax perspective, I think when people do the math, it’s not going to be as game changing as they expect it to be,” Orecchio said.
For example, a taxpayer in the 28 percent federal tax bracket who shifts $100,000 of pretax dollars to a Roth IRA from a traditional IRA would pay $28,000 in taxes, in addition to whatever is owed in state taxes. “There are many people who simply don’t have that kind of a side account to pay the income tax, so for them it isn’t very practical to consider a Roth,” said Christine Fahlund, a senior financial planner at T. Rowe Price Group Inc. in Baltimore.
A partial conversion to a Roth IRA from a traditional IRA may be the most tax-efficient plan because of the diversification benefits, said Orecchio, who estimates about half of his clients may convert some money to a Roth IRA next year. “You never know how the tax code will work in the future. By owning different IRAs, you’re protected from whatever the government might decide to do,” Orecchio said.
Partial conversions may also be desirable for those with larger portfolios that would require a large tax payment at conversion, said Fahlund of T. Rowe Price. And the flexibility of partial conversions can also be beneficial to those who are self- employed or whose income varies year to year. In a year with less income, an investor can convert less of a traditional IRA to avoid having a larger tax burden for the year, according to Fahlund.
Holding Period
The Roth accounts, including those converted from traditional IRAs, must be held for five years and account holders must be at least 59 and a half before money can be withdrawn tax free. Savers who don’t follow the withdrawal rules or meet exemptions face a 10 percent penalty for distributions. Investors who decide to convert to Roth IRAs must declare the conversion amount on their tax forms. The tax owed depends on whether the assets being transferred are made up of pre or post-tax dollars. In 2010 only, converters will be able to pay the tax liability in 2011 and 2012.
There’s a fallback for investors who decide to convert and regret the decision. A Roth can be switched back to a traditional IRA account, or re characterized. Since investors who convert to a Roth IRA don’t have to pay taxes on the conversion until the following year, they have until April 2011, or October 2011, if they get an extension to file, to reverse the conversion, said Slott, the IRA consultant.
[2010 Update] Vanguard recently published some good factors to consider when considering converting an IRA to a Roth IRA. These include:
1. You have to pay taxes on the amount you convert. In return for the potential future tax breaks of a Roth, you have to pay income taxes when you convert. That means if you have money in a traditional IRA that you haven’t yet paid taxes on, you could have a substantial tax bill. Say you’re in the 28% tax bracket, you could owe $28,000 on a conversion of $100,000. Still, converting may benefit you in the long run if you expect you’ll be taxed at a higher rate when you retire. If you expect your rate will be lower, converting may not be beneficial. If, like most people, you’re not sure what your future tax rate may be, you could consider converting just part of your traditional IRA to a Roth. Doing so gives you “tax diversification” because you’ve got some money in a Roth and some still in a traditional IRA.
2. It’s a good idea to use money outside of your IRA to pay the conversion taxes. You can get the most benefit from switching to a Roth if you can pay the conversion taxes without using money from your IRA. If you convert and don’t pull money out of your IRA, you can increase your after-tax purchasing power in retirement. In effect, $10,000 in a Roth IRA gives you more to spend in retirement than $10,000 in a traditional pre-tax IRA. Remember, taxes could substantially reduce the amount you’re left with when you withdraw from the traditional IRA.
And there’s another reason not to tap your IRA for the conversion taxes: If you’re under age 59½, the amount you withdraw may be subject to a 10% IRS penalty. A cash account may be a good place to get the money to pay the taxes on the conversion.
3. You can lighten the tax burden of a conversion. If you don’t have enough money to pay taxes on converting all your traditional IRA assets, or if doing so would push you into a higher tax bracket, you can consider converting just part of your assets. In addition, a special provision applies to 2010 conversions that gives you the option of postponing the tax bill and paying it off over two years. If you choose this route, taxable income that results from the conversion gets split evenly between 2011 and 2012. But be aware that tax rates are scheduled to go up in 2011, so—barring any new tax legislation—you could end up paying taxes at a higher rate.
4. Penalties may apply if you withdraw within five years of a conversion. A conversion may not be for you if you expect you’ll withdraw the money within five years. Generally speaking, you’ll only be able to withdraw earnings from the account without taxes and penalties if you’re age 59½ or older and you’ve held the Roth IRA for at least five years.As for withdrawals of your original conversion amount, those are tax-free. But to avoid a 10% IRS penalty, you generally must be either at least age 59½ or wait at least five years after your conversion to make the withdrawal.
5. Your heirs may benefit from the conversion. During your lifetime, you don’t have to take money out of the Roth IRA because you’re not subject to RMDs. That means you can leave the entire accumulated balance to someone else. And while a beneficiary who inherits your Roth IRA may be subject to RMDs, he or she can withdraw the amount of your original conversion tax-free. Any earnings are also tax-free, provided that the Roth IRA meets the five-year holding requirement.
Related:
~ Real Tax deductions that may surprise you
~ Single Step Personal Finance Challenge- Roth IRA
~ Why the fall in stock prices was good for your 401K
~ 401K Basics
More Related posts:
- Traditional versus Roth IRA Comparison – 2010 and 2011 Limits, Eligibility and Contribution Rules
- 401k Rollover and Conversion To Roth Accounts May Soon be Permitted
- Roth 401k and Traditional 401k Plans – Comparisons, Benefits & 2010 Income and Contribution Limits
- 2010 401k Contribution and Catch-up Retirement Plan Limits Unchanged from 2009 plus 2011 Projections
- SEP IRA Rules and Contribution Limits – 2010 Changes to Simplified Employee Pension Individual Retirement Plans For Small Business Employers




{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
A recent Fidelity Investments study (http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/fidelity/40306/) found that many investors are still struggling to understand the fundamental benefits of a Roth IRA. Additionally, 88 percent are unaware of the 2010 Roth IRA conversion opportunity.
Fidelity believes that most investors should consider having a Roth IRA as part of their overall retirement plan to help minimize taxes and maximize retirement savings. However, the study finds that although more than half (56 percent) of those surveyed say they are confident they understand the benefits of a Roth IRA, their actual knowledge of features and the federal tax-free growth and withdrawal advantages is lacking. For example, many investors did not correctly answer when asked if:
— Contributions are tax deductible (28 percent answered incorrectly) or if investment gains and income are tax free (20 percent) and can be withdrawn tax free after age 59-1/2 (32 percent)
— Withdrawals need to be made starting at age 70-1/2 (66 percent) or if contributions may continue after age 70-1/2 (70 percent)
— Money may be used for a first-time home purchase (57 percent) or college education (62 percent)
“This survey highlights that many investors first need to understand the benefits of a Roth IRA before they can consider if a conversion is right for them,” said Chris McDermott, vice president, Fidelity Investments. “It also reinforces how important investor education will be in helping individuals to evaluate their specific needs around this complex decision.”
When examining the potential future actions of investors, many say they are willing to investigate a Roth IRA conversion for a 401(k) left with a former employer or other IRA (55 percent), such as a Traditional, SEP or SIMPLE IRA. However, when asked about the biggest obstacles to converting, respondents cite their lack of understanding as the most significant barrier, but also listed others. For example:
— Approximately one third of investors indicate they do not understand a Roth IRA conversion’s tax implications (34 percent) or the tax structure of a Roth IRA itself (30 percent)
— Nearly a third (30 percent) say their balances are too small for a conversion or they lack sufficient funds (27 percent) to cover the conversion tax costs
— One in five (20 percent) do not believe a Roth IRA fits their needs
“Considering that a Roth IRA offers tax-free withdrawals and growth potential, analysis done by Fidelity indicates that most investors should consider having one as part of their overall retirement plan to help minimize taxes and maximize retirement savings,” said McDermott. “We believe if investors have at least 10 years before making withdrawals, anticipate a higher tax rate in retirement or plan to leave savings to heirs, they should consider a conversion.”
{ 3 trackbacks }