tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026484337051027793.post4914740310634307972..comments2008-07-14T09:08:54.457-04:00Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14309605333128481208andy@savingtoinvest.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026484337051027793.post-38099345211018488392008-07-14T09:08:54.457-04:002008-07-14T09:08:54.457-04:00SB - Yep. Very expensive stock. Even though they have great technology (best of breed) virtulization is being a commodity business. Hence the hugh multiples are no longer justified.<BR/><BR/>Diracm - Thanks for pointing that out. I have fixed it.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14309605333128481208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026484337051027793.post-34688641320245489802008-07-14T08:17:08.777-04:002008-07-14T08:17:08.777-04:00"vitalization technology" should be "virtualization technology".<BR/>-FredDiracMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08005972130517976048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026484337051027793.post-62994944141420434502008-07-09T14:41:32.339-04:002008-07-09T14:41:32.339-04:00Yikes! This stock is trading at 66 times its earnings! What was the P/E ratio when it was at $125???<BR/>Geez, stocks with a P/E over 20 make me nervous.<BR/>Sigh, how soon we forget....sirbeefhttp://sirbeef.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.com