QE3 Announced and What It Means For You

16 comments

[Update - Fed Undertakes QE3] The Federal Reserve has confirmed market expectations of a new round of quantitative easing, known as QE3. The new round of easing will be done by expanding its holdings of long-term securities with open-ended purchases of $40 billion of mortgage debt a month. The focus, as discussed in the update below, is to boost economic growth and reduce unemployment. Economic growth slowed to a 1.7 percent annual pace in the second quarter from 4.1 percent in the final three months of last year, with a median analyst forecast of 2.1% growth for 2013. Unemployment is expected to remain around 8% for the next 6-12 months.

As a side effect of QE3, interest rates are expected to remain at record lows through 2015. This pushed investors towards higher returning equity and commodity markets, like the stock market which has hit multi-year highs in anticipation of QE3. Gold and Oil prices were also up. The US dollar fell against the specter of an extended low interest rate environment.

“If the outlook for the labor market does not improve substantially, the committee will continue its purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities, undertake additional asset purchases and employ its other policy tools as appropriate,” the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) said today in an official post-meeting statement

The Fed said it will continue its program to swap $667 billion of short-term debt with longer-term securities to lengthen the average maturity of its holdings, an action dubbed Operation Twist.

I will continue to provide updates on 2013 tax rate changes and encourage you to subscribe (free) via RSS, Email, Facebook or Twitter to get the latest news.

______

QE (quantitative easing) is essentially the printing of money and the addition of liquidity into the markets so that stock (and other asset) prices are given an artificial boost. Federal reserve chief, Ben Bernanke believes that by pulling up stocks, the masses will feel richer and spend more on consumer goods, thus lifting up the economy. This is based on Karl Marx’s reflexivity theory (George Soros basically paraphrased Marx) in which by turning the small wheel (stocks), you can turn the big wheel (economy), which in turn will come back and turn up the small wheel (stocks). Bernanke subscribes to such a theory, and he wants QE to lift up the small wheel (stocks), which he hopes will lift up the big wheel (the economy).

But after two successive rounds of QE (QE1 in 2009 and QE2 in 2010), it has become crystal clear that quantitative easing doesn’t work nearly as well as theory says it should! In the short term, QE can pull up stocks and the economy, but in the long term, the economy is going to go where it’s going to go, regardless of how much liquidity the Federal Reserve is pumping into the economy and stocks. Everyone has now recognized that the economy is slowing down (including Congress), and everyone knows that the Federal Reserve has only one bullet left: QE3. QE is like a medical drug – take it once, and you’ll heal very quickly. But every time the disease comes back, you’ll need to take bigger and bigger doses of that drug, and each time you take the drug, the drug becomes less and less effective until eventually, the drug is useless. QE3 is the last round of QE because everyone knows that QE4, 5, 6… will be pointless.

Will QE3 be announced at the next Federal Reserve meeting? Will the Fed shoot its final bullet? Out of the 11 Federal Reserve officials, 10 have already voted “yes”. However, the decision ultimately lies to the Fed Chairman, Bernanke, who has veto power. Right now, the commodity and stock markets are stalling and waiting to see what will happen at the August Fed meeting. Here’s what I think about the chances of QE3 being announced at the August meeting.

Factors Influencing Bernanke’s Decision

  1. Romney has stated that, if elected president, he will not renew Bernanke’s term as Federal Reserve Chairman in January 2014. Meanwhile, Obama is a great defender of Bernanke, who will do anything in his power to ensure that Obama wins this year’s election. Historically speaking, the stock market has had a great influence on electoral results – the administrations at the time usually win the re-elction if stocks do ok during election time, and administrations at the time usually lose if stocks fall during re-election time. This means that Bernanke needs to ensure that stock prices don’t fall from now until November 4 2012.
  2. Everyone, including Bernanke himself, knows that this is the Fed’s last bullet. If he shoots this bullet (initiates QE3), he has no more weapons on his arsenal should the economy and stocks tank hard.
  3. Everyone is looking towards Bernanke. Congress has already said that the economy is slowing down & that the “Fed is the only game in town.” If Bernanke doesn’t initiate QE3 now, it’ll seem like he’s behind the curve, which is bad PR for Bernanke.

Why He Will Initiate QE3 at the August Meeting

  1. Bernanke must prop up stocks from now until the election. In addition, every knows that the economy is already slowing down, so Bernanke will look bad (from a PR standpoint) if he’s too slow in reacting.
  2. If he’s going to initiate QE3, he can’t wait until the September 12 – 13 meeting. Markets usually take 2 – 3 months to react to QE, which means that should he initiate QE3 in September, it won’t have any positive effect on stocks until the elections are already over. This leaves Bernanke with one choice: announce QE3 on August 1.

Why He Won’t Initiate QE3 At All

  1. Everyone knows that this is Bernanke’s last bullet, so once he shoots that last bullet, all the short sellers might sell on the news. So instead of propping stocks up, QE3 might just cause stocks to tank. Bernanke knows this too, which is why he’s hesitant about initiating QE3.
  2. Bernanke’safraid that QE might cause commodity prices to rise (which has happened in the past), which is bad for the economy because the cost of everything goes up. Already going up, oil prices will rise even more should QE3 be initiated. This will send shock waves through an already frail economy.

Whether Bernanke does or doesn’t initiate QE3 is uncertain, and if he does, what the market’s reaction will be is even more uncertain. I hate investing in markets like this, when you shouldn’t really be doing anything because the decision (QE3) can go either way. You never know – Bernanke might wake up all happy one day and initiate QE3, or if he’s in a down mood, might not initiate QE3.

This was a guest post from Tony, an individual macro investor, ho blogs at A Young Investor where he teaches other investors how to invest in stocks, commodities, and currencies from a macro, fundamental, and technical perspective.

Bookmark and Share

Liked what you read? Then stay connected and get the latest articles via RSS, Email or Facebook

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Jeff September 13, 2012 at 2:00 pm

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has said he wouldn’t reappoint Bernanke when his term ends in January 2014. Best decision ever!

Reply

Samuel August 31, 2012 at 5:55 am

So overall I jus wanna knw what exactly he could do….
I mean now that he knows that he might. Of get re-elected so why
to print more money n prop up the stocks…
Or he vl give a second chance n shoots d last bullet of QE3
N do lil better for the economy….
N eventhough if he does n if it affects the prices of commodities
And what the short sellers might sell more after hearing the news..
As u said….
What u think what exactly he could do @ this situation…..

Reply

Kramer July 26, 2012 at 1:22 pm

The idea that QE has only one purpose – to induce a wealth effect – distorts discussion of its utility and the likelihood of its continuation. Here are a few other effects of QE, any of which might be called a purpose of engaging in it:

1. Punishment of pure savers. QE not only fills the gap between spending, on the one hand, and taxes and borrowing on the other, it widens that gap by discouraging lending to the Government. A Treasury bond is a contract between the Federal Government and the owner of dollars whereby the owner agrees not to deploy the money in any productive way for a stated period of time, and the Government agrees to pay the owner a periodic fee (called “interest”). In a recession, the Government WANTS people to spend money, so it offers a smaller fee to those who insist on NOT spending it. Indeed, in real terms, the fee may be negative, which is to say that the government PUNISHES savers when it needs spenders. QE is the mechanism for that process.

2. Cost of consumer credit. We buy big-ticket items on credit. By keeping interest rates low, the Fed enables people, whether or not their stock holdings have risen, to afford to buy things that they might not otherwise be able to afford, or even to qualify for loans to buy them. Our recession is characterized by credit contraction. QE pushes back, not with complete success, but it is certainly a better policy than NOT pushing back.

3. Cost of commercial credit. There are lots of cross-currents affecting the issuance of corporate credit, but two things seem to me intuitively obvious (although, of course, subject to empirical correction): (i) all else being equal, it is easier to get credit with QE than without it, and (ii) until renewed demand stresses supply, a lower cost of credit translates into lower prices and, therefore, more spending.

In short, QE does a lot of good things in a balance sheet recession. Whether it does enough of any one of them is not really dispositive of the decision to engage in it. If low interest rates will be better for the economy than high ones, then QE will be used to the extent necessary to achieve them. In Japan, with its absurdly high personal savings rate, the BOJ can’t ease enough to drive off bond buyers. The Fed is not having much more luck, as our trading partners have no place else to put our money now that the black hole of RMBS has imploded. But one does what one can, and there appears to be no downside to QE that can’t be reversed on a dime should demand actually return to our economy.

Reply

Marzuki Malik July 23, 2012 at 9:07 pm

I personally believe QE would work better in a micro environment (factors affecting US economy from within or limited external factors affecting the economy). To address macro factors which includes endless problems face by Eurozone, Japan road to full recovery and etc, all of which is affecting US, is just too much for QE to have a prolong and meaningful impact on the US economy. In other words, just imagine a snake trying to swallow an elephant.

Reply

Bob July 23, 2012 at 6:10 pm

I hope that it is not done to make Obama look good for re election, because he is a useless president all he does is play golf and have fundraisers.

Reply

Tony July 24, 2012 at 6:11 am

Agreed. He cares more about his personal ratings than the country’s

Reply

Gail July 23, 2012 at 7:45 am

The U.S. will make little progress tackling high unemployment before 2014 unless the Federal Reserve eases policy further, i.e taking the option of “QE3”

Reply

Tony July 24, 2012 at 6:13 am

But the fed has nothing left to ease with. Also, monetary policy isn’t helpful when it comes to unemployment

Reply

Tony @ A Young Investor July 23, 2012 at 6:03 am

I’ll be around to respond to anyone’s comments.

Reply

Leave a Comment


5 − = 3

{ 7 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post:

Disclaimer: The information contained on Saving to Invest (this site) is for general information purposes only and does not constitute factual or professional financial advice. In accordance with FTC guidelines, we disclose that we may have a financial relationship with some of the merchants/companies mentioned on this website. We do our best to maintain current information, but due to the rapidly changing environment, some information may have changed since it was published. Please do the appropriate research before participating in any third party offers. Refer to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for more information